THE ADMISSIBILITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN CASES OF SEXUAL CONTENT DISSEMINATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24002/dlc.v3i1.12751Keywords:
Digital Rights, Electronic Evidence, ITE Law, Pandeglang Decision, Privacy RightsAbstract
The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed the nature of crime and evidence, requiring legal systems to accommodate electronic forms of proof. This study analyzes the admissibility of electronic evidence in Indonesian criminal procedure law and its implications for the protection of privacy, particularly in cases involving the dissemination of sexual content. Using a normative juridical approach, this research examines statutory frameworks, including the ITE Law and its 2024 amendment, the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 20 of 2025 on the new Criminal Procedure Code, and Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection. It also employs a case study of the Pandeglang District Court Decision No. 71/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pdl to assess the gap between das sollen and das sein. The findings indicate that Indonesia has normatively established a clear legal basis recognizing electronic evidence as valid and binding. However, judicial practice, particularly in cases decided prior to the enactment of the new KUHAP and the Personal Data Protection Law, tends to prioritize evidentiary validity over the protection of victims’ privacy. The Pandeglang case demonstrates that although electronic evidence was lawfully admitted, the absence of procedural safeguards created risks of re-victimization and undermined the victim’s dignity. This study concludes that while the issue of admissibility has been resolved under the current legal framework, challenges remain in ensuring privacy protection in judicial practice. Therefore, courts must adopt rights-sensitive approaches, including closed hearings, anonymization, and proportional use of evidence, to balance evidentiary effectiveness with the protection of fundamental rights in the digital era.
References
Books
Harkrisnowo, et al., Law and Justice in a Globalized World: Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, Depok, Indonesia, 7–9 November 2016: Topics in Law and Justice, London: CRC Press/Balkema Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.
Indonesia Judicial Research Society, Maharani, Marsha, Inatsan Ashila, Bestha, Ismaya, Siti, Assyifa, Aisyah, Wicaksana, Dio Ashar, Barus, Naomi Rehulina, dan Nasir, Muhammad Ad’har, The Role of Legal Empowerment by the Community in Strengthening Access to Justice for Women in Conflict with the Law in Indonesia, Jakarta: Indonesia Judicial Research Society, 2023.
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Riyadi, Eko, “Institutionalization of Human Rights Standards in Indonesia,” dalam Tømte, Aksel, dan Riyadi, Eko (eds.), International Human Rights and Local Courts: Human Rights Interpretation in Indonesia, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge, 2024.
Smits, Jan M., “What is Legal Doctrine? In the Aims and Methods of Legal-Dogmatic Research,” dalam van Gestel, R., Micklitz, H., dan Rubin, E. L. (eds.), Rethinking Legal Scholarship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Journal Articles
Afisa, Afisa, Zuly Qodir, Akhmad Habibullah, and Unggul Sugiharto, “Analysis of the ITE Law on Digital Rights and Democratic Values in Indonesia,” The Journal of Society and Media 8, no. 2 (2024): 424–444, https://doi.org/10.26740/jsm.v8n2.p424-444.
Al-Billeh, Tareq, Ali Al-Hammouri, Tawfiq Khashashneh, Mohammed Makhmari, and Hamad Kalbani, “Digital Evidence in Human Rights Violations and International Criminal Justice,” Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System 4, no. 3 (2024): 842–871, https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i3.446.
Ariansyah, and Lucky Eka Khalis Aulia ES, “Reconstruction of the Position of Electronic Documents as Evidence in Civil Case Evidence Based on Deep Ecology,” Judex Laguens 3, no. 1 (2025): 95–112, https://doi.org/10.25216/ikahi.3.1.4.2025.95-112.
Balkibayeva, Zhanagul, “Problems of Admissibility and Reliability of Metadata as Evidence,” International Journal of Law and Policy 2 (2024): 48–58, https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.232.
Dewi, Erna, “The Problems of Sexual Consent in Colleges Environment,” Migration Letters 21, no. S3 (2024): 1376–1382, https://migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/7474.
Friedewald, Michael, Rachel Finn, and David Wright, “Seven Types of Privacy,” dalam Privacy and Identity Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Springer, 2013), 3–32, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5184-2_1.
Haetami, Enden, “The Strength of Electronic Evidence in the View of Islamic Law,” International Journal of Science and Society 4, no. 4 (2023): 666–675, https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i4.615.
Huang, Yage, “Authenticating Social Media Evidence in Chinese Criminal Procedure Law—A Comparative Study,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 31, no. 2 (2024): 45–49, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/etd.
Hutagalung, Sri Devina, Dea Ananda P Sitompul, Kezia Priskila Sinaga, Sigar P Berutu, and Alendra, “Analysis of Legal Protection of Women’s Human Rights in Indonesia,” International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research 11, no. 2 (2023): 316–325, https://www.ijobsor.pelnus.ac.id.
Kenneally, Erin, and Christopher Brown, “Risk Sensitive Digital Evidence Collection,” Digital Investigation 2, no. 2 (2005): 101–119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2005.02.001.
Kohl, Uta, “The Right to Be Forgotten in Data Protection Law and Two Western Cultures of Privacy,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 72, no. 3 (2023): 737–769, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589323000258.
Lasaka, Mustalim, “Ius Constituendum of Electronic Evidence Arrangement in Criminal Procedure Law,” Jurnal Legalitas 16, no. 2 (2023): 154–166, https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v16i2.20306.
Mccaughey, Martha, and Jill Cermele, “Violations of Sexual and Information Privacy: Understanding Dataraid in a (Cyber)Rape Culture,” Violence Against Women 28, no. 11 (2022): 3955–3976, https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012211070316.
Michael, Katina, Shannon Kobran, Roba Abbas, and Salah Hamdoun, “Privacy, Data Rights and Cybersecurity: Technology for Good in the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals,” dalam 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (2019): 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS48451.2019.8937956.
Moussa, Ahmed, “Electronic Evidence and Its Authenticity in Forensic Evidence,” Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences 11 (2021): 20, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6.
Muhtar, Abdul Kadir Zaylani, Muh. Risnain, dan Zunnuraeni, “The Right to Life Based on The International Covenant on Civil And Political Rights And Its Application In Indonesian National Law,” Mataram Journal of International Law 2, no. 2 (2024): 125–144, https://doi.org/10.29303/majil.v2i2.5031.
Muzakkir, and Taufik Hidayat, “Juridical Review Article 27A of Law Number 1 of 2024 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 Concerning Information and Electronic Transactions,” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 19, no. 2 (2025): 238–249, https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v19i2.10650.
Putri, Ni Made Diana Kencana, “Analysis of Recognition from the Perspective of International Law and Implementation of Public Policies in Indonesia and Myanmar,” Focus Journal Law Review 3, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.62795/fjl.v3i2.226.
Reis, Oluwatosin, Nkechi Eneh, Benedicta Ehimuan, Anthony Anyanwu, Temidayo Olorunsogo, and Temitayo Abrahams, “Privacy Law Challenges in the Digital Age: A Global Review of Legislation and Enforcement,” International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences 6, no. 1 (2024): 73–88, https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i1.733.
Saputra, Aga Naya, and Ghina Salsabila Aven, “Legal Analysis of the Use of Electronic Evidence in Providing Evidence in Corruption Cases (Decisions in Indonesia),” Legal Brief 14, no. 3 (2025): 764–773, https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v14i3.1410.
Setyawan, Adisti Puspa, Antonius Sambodo Adi A, I Dewa B S Wirantaya, Pina Mustika, and William Gomarga, “Indonesia’s Electronic Information and Transactions Law: History, Impact, and Challenges,” Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management 4, no. 12 (2025): 2154–2165, https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v4i12.899.
Stoykova, Radina, “Digital Evidence: Unaddressed Threats to Fairness and the Presumption of Innocence,” Computer Law & Security Review 42 (2021): 105575, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575.
Syahwami, Syahwami, and Hamirul Hamirul, “The Erosion of Privacy in the Digital Age: A Constitutional Challenge in Indonesia,” Enigma in Law 2, no. 2 (2024): 75–84, https://doi.org/10.61996/law.v2i2.56.
Tejerizo, María, “Digital Evidence and Fair Trial Rights at the International Criminal Court,” Leiden Journal of International Law 36 (2023): 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000031.
Yaskur, Fajar, and Ifahda Pratama Hapsari, “The Existence of Sexual Violence Crime in Indonesia,” JUSTISI 11, no. 1 (2024): 95–110, https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i1.3748.
Internet
International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), “Indonesia: Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes and Online Gender-Based Violence Against Women,” September 1, 2023, https://www.icj.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Briefing-Paper-on-OGBV_ENG.pdf.
Law Commission, “Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecutions: Consultation Paper 259,” May 15, 2023, https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/evidence-in-sexual-offence-prosecutions/.
Pengadilan Negeri Pandeglang, “Putusan Nomor 71/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Pdl,” 2023, https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaee3fd389af4eac9787313033333437.html.
Vasiliev, Sergey, “The Role and Legal Status of the Prosecutor in International Criminal Trials,” November 26, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1715465.
