Comparative Perspectives: Exploring Workflow Efficiencies of BIM and CAD in 3D Modelling

Authors

  • Henricus Arya Wisnu Wardana Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Audrey Maura Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Meliana Putri Suman Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Steffania Jacinda Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v3i1.8321

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis , BIM Workflow , CAD, Architecture Modelling

Abstract

Building Information Modelling (BIM) is a new technology to make genuine project contributions, especially in the industry, architecture, and construction sectors. However, in practice, many professional workforces choose computer-aided design (CAD) as the primary technology, which has formerly appeared and is further comprehensible. Building Information Modelling offered different perspectives on purpose to facilitate designers or architects to expertise in various fields. Building Information Modelling (BIM) contains informative data that can use some expertise as a solution to make the occupation more coherent. This research aims to comprehend the workflow differences between Computer Aided Design (CAD) and Building Information Modelling (BIM) system technology. We collated methods by reviewing some literature and reviewing case studies. Then, we compare the workflow and conclude which is more effective for architectural design. In this research, we explore the difference between BIM's workflow and Cad's workflow to know which is more effective. So, we conclude and can apply the technology appropriately in the workflow needed so that it can simplify the workflow.

References

Admin, “Apa itu BIM – Building Information Modelling ?,” Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan. Accessed: Oct.

, 2023. [Online]. Available: BIM, Reflex dan Gable 4D Series

U. Toker, Parametric Methods for Beginners. Routledge, 2022. doi: 10.4324/9781003230052.

A. Muhsin, “Perbandingan Antara Alur Kerja BIM Dengan CAD Pada Proses Renovasi Rumah Tinggal,”

Jurnal Arsitektur TERRACOTTA, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.26760/terracotta.v2i3.4899.

J. Pantiga, A. Soekiman, F. Teknik, J. T. Sipil, and U. K. Parahyangan, “KAJIAN IMPLEMENTASI BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) DI DUNIA KONSTRUKSI INDONESIA Magister Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi , Universitas Katolik Parahyangan , Bandung,” vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 104–110, 2021.

P. Barnes, BIM in Principle and Practice. 2019. doi: 10.1680/bimpp.63693.

Dr C Erdem Imrak, "Introduction to Computer Aided Drawing." Accessed: Oct. 22, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://transport.itu.edu.tr/docs/librariesprovider99/dersnotlari/dersnotlarires112e/not/cadd- 1.pdf?sfvrsn=4

AGC Research Foundation, The Contractors' Guide to BIM, 1st ed. Las Vegas, 2005.

Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation, Adopting BIM for facilities management Solutions for managing the Sydney Opera House. 2007.

S. & L. Eastman, Teicholz, A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Architects, Engineers, Contractors, and Fabricators, vol. 53, no. 9. 2008.

F. C. Nugrahini and T. A. Permana, “Building Information Modelling (BIM) dalam Tahapan Desain dan Konstruksi di Indonesia, Peluang Dan Tantangan : Studi Kasus Perluasan T1 Bandara Juanda Surabaya,” Agregat, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 459–467, 2020, doi: 10.30651/ag.v5i2.6588.

S. Azhar, A. Nadeem, J. Y. N. Mok, and B. H. Y. Leung, "Building Information Modeling (BIM): A New Paradigm for Visual Interactive Modeling and Simulation for Construction Projects," First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries (ICCIDC-I), no. November, pp. 435–446, 2008.

S. & L. Eastman, Teicholz, A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Architects, Engineers, Contractors, and Fabricators, vol. 53, no. 9. 2008.

K. Ernandi, “PUSAT STUDI DAN PRODUKSI FILM DI YOGYAKARTA,” Universitas Islam Indonesia,

Yogyakarta, 2002. [Online]. Available: www.greatbuilding.com

C.-K. Lim, "A Framework of CAD/CAM Design and Construction Process for Freeform Architecture: A Case Study," International Journal of Architectural Computing, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 301–317, 2010, doi: 10.1260/1478-0771.8.3.301.

S. Guerra de Oliveira, S. A. Biancardo, and A. Tibaut, "Optimizing H-BIM Workflow for Interventions on Historical Building Elements," Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 15, pp. 1–19, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14159703.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-09

How to Cite

[1]
H. A. W. . Wardana, A. Maura, M. P. Suman, and S. Jacinda, “Comparative Perspectives: Exploring Workflow Efficiencies of BIM and CAD in 3D Modelling”, JARINA, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 42–52, Feb. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Artificial Intelligence for Architectural Evolution: From Virtual Pedagogy to Biodigital Tectonics and Beyond

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Henricus Arya Wisnu Wardana, Audrey Maura, Meliana Putri Suman, Steffania Jacinda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).