The Role of Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence in Biophilic Architectural Design Based on the Principle of Symbiosis

Authors

  • Adityo Adityo Kumamoto University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v3i2.9119

Keywords:

Neuroscience, Artifial intelligence, Biophilic architecture, Symbiotic, Human-nature relationship

Abstract

Biophilic architecture aims to create an environment that enhances connectivity between humans and nature to improve physical, mental, and emotional well-being. This review analyses 25 recent scientific journals on the application of neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) to optimise biophilic architectural design based on the principle of symbiosis. Results show that neuroscience provides valuable insights into human psychophysiological responses to various biophilic elements, while AI enables complex data processing, predictive modelling, and real-time design adaptation. The collaboration of neuroscience and AI can help produce a more effective, responsive to human needs, and sustainable biophilic environment. On the other hand, flexibility is demonstrated by the breadth of the architectural design process phases that can be reached through this collaboration. However, methodological and ethical challenges must be addressed to ensure responsible application.

References

E. O. Wilson, Biophilia. Cambridge, MA, USA; London, UK: Harvard University Press, 1984.

G. Barbiero and R. Berto, "Biophilia as Evolutionary Adaptation: An Onto- and Phylogenetic Framework for Biophilic Design," Frontiers in Psychology. 2021.

S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, and M. Mador, Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley, 2013.

"14 Patterns of Biophilic Design." [Online]. Available: https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/reports/14-patterns/. [Accessed: 03-Apr-2020].

E. A. Edelstein and E. Macagno, "Form follows function: Bridging neuroscience and architecture," in Springer Optimization and Its Applications, 2012, pp. 27–41.

S. Chaillou, "AI and architecture," in The Routledge Companion to Artificial Intelligence in Architecture, 2021.

P. Satwiko, S. Felasari, and M. Cininta, Neuroarsitektur. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, 2023.

I. Ritchie, NeuroArchitecture. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2020.

J. P. Eberhard, Brain Landscape: The Coexistence of Neuroscience and Architecture. 2009.

J. Pallasmaa, H. F. Mallgrave, and M. Arbib, Architecture and Neuroscience. 2015.

S. S. S. Abdullah, D. R. A. Rambli, S. Sulaiman, E. Alyan, F. Merienne, and N. Diyana, "The impact of virtual nature therapy on stress responses: A systematic qualitative review," Forests. 2021.

S. Funahashi, "Working memory in the prefrontal cortex," Brain Sciences. 2017.

S. I. M. A. Hady, "Activating biophilic design patterns as a sustainable landscape approach," J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2021.

M. B. Andreucci, A. Loder, M. Brown, and J. Brajković, "Exploring challenges and opportunities of biophilic urban design: Evidence from research and experimentation," Sustain., 2021.

N. Li, S. Zhang, L. Xia, and Y. Wu, "Investigating the Visual Behavior Characteristics of Architectural Heritage Using Eye-Tracking," Buildings, 2022.

R. Zhang et al., "Impacts of dynamic led lighting on the well-being and experience of office occupants," Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2020.

L. Gradišar, R. Klinc, Ž. Turk, and M. Dolenc, "Generative Design Methodology and Framework Exploiting Designer-Algorithm Synergies," Buildings, 2022.

L. Yang, J. Li, H. T. Chang, Z. Zhao, H. Ma, and L. Zhou, "A Generative Urban Space Design Method Based on Shape Grammar and Urban Induction Patterns," Land, 2023.

M. A. Nitu, O. Gocer, N. Wijesooriya, D. Vijapur, and C. Candido, "A Biophilic Design Approach for Improved Energy Performance in Retrofitting Residential Projects," Sustain., 2022.

M. Sheikh, M. Qassem, and P. A. Kyriacou, "Wearable, Environmental, and Smartphone-Based Passive Sensing for Mental Health Monitoring," Front. Digit. Heal., 2021.

M. Mollazadeh and Y. Zhu, "Application of virtual environments for biophilic design: A critical review," Buildings. 2021.

S. Tarek and A. S. E. D. Ouf, "Biophilic smart cities: the role of nature and technology in enhancing urban resilience," J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 2021.

P. Satwiko and B. Michelle, "From Science Fiction to Science Facts: Digital Architects," Atl. Press. Webinar Int. Arsit. Digit. 2021 (IWEDA 2021)Kemajuan dalam Penelit. Ilmu Sosoal, Pendidik. dan Hum., 2021.

S. Wang, G. Sanches de Oliveira, Z. Djebbara, and K. Gramann, "The Embodiment of Architectural Experience: A Methodological Perspective on Neuro-Architecture," Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2022.

O. Müller and S. Rotter, "Neurotechnology: Current Developments and Ethical Issues," Front. Syst. Neurosci., 2017.

M. Mazzone and A. Elgammal, "Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence," Arts, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 26, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-24

How to Cite

[1]
A. Adityo, “The Role of Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence in Biophilic Architectural Design Based on the Principle of Symbiosis”, JARINA, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 81–94, Aug. 2024.