Evaluation of Natural Light in EcoHouse Bandung

Authors

  • Prisca Bicawasti Budi Sutanty Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Stefanus Christian Diyaneswara Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v3i2.9183

Keywords:

Eco-house, Ecotect analysis, Natural light, Design concept, Residential Lighting

Abstract

The availability of natural lighting is significant to the quality of life in a residential setting. A residence that is conducive to health and comfort requires adequate natural sunlight, which can eliminate viruses and mould indoors and improve the health of its occupants. Furthermore, the strategic incorporation of natural lighting can also lead to a reduction in energy expenditure. This research aims to evaluate the natural lighting in the EcoHouse Bandung, designed by SHAU Architecture and Urbanism, to ascertain its effectiveness and identify areas requiring improvement. The methodology employed entails the utilisation of simulations conducted with the Autodesk Ecotect Analysis 2011, encompassing the assessment of Shadow Range, Solar Access Analysis, and Lighting Analysis. The analysis results demonstrate that the EcoHouse Bandung has responded effectively regarding orientation and building envelope utilisation. However, some areas require specific adjustments due to insufficient or excessive light intensity. The analysis indicates the necessity for optimisation in several areas, including workspaces, living rooms, dining rooms, and bathrooms on the first floor. This research identifies three main principles for eco-house design: firstly, primary lighting should not disturb neighbours or cause harm to occupants; secondly, facade materials and technologies should be selected based on each façade's specific requirements; and thirdly, corridors should be considered as primary barriers in reducing excess heat and light. These findings are anticipated to optimise existing conditions and achieve ideal standards that support environmental sustainability and occupant comfort.

References

Kementerian Permukiman dan Prasarana Wilayah Republik Indonesia, “Pedoman Teknis Pembangunan Rumah Sederhana Sehat,” Jakarta, 2002.

P. Manurung, Pencahayaan Alami dalam Arsitektur. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2012.

L. Dennis, Green Interior Design. New York: Allworth Press, 2010.

H. Frick, A. Ardiyanto, and AMS. Darmawaan, Fisika Bangunan. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, 2008.

M. Widyarti, “Kajian dan Rekonstruksi Konsep Eco-village dan Eco-house pada Permukiman Sasak - Senaru Dalam berdasarkan Community Sustainibility Assessment,” Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2011.

Y. R. Naura and D. Larasati, “Isu-Isu Prioritas dalam Penerapan Eco-House Berdasarkan Gaya Hidup,” Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture, vol. 4, 2021.

A. Z. Arief, “Implementasi Konsep Ecohouse Dan Ecoliving Pada Arsitektur – Permukiman Tradisional Sasak,” Spectra, vol. XIV, no. 27, pp. 1–14, 2016.

A. P. Wibowo, “Kriteria Rumah Ramah Lingkungan (Eco-Friendly House),” Jurnal Muara Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017.

L. Hakim, A. Gunawan, and B. Sulistyantara, “Efektivitas Void papda Pengudaraan Silang untuk Kenyamanan di Dalam Ruang,” Jurnal Arsitektur NALARs, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131–144, 2015.

E. D. Purnama and F. N. Poppy, Pemanfaatan Pencahayaan Alami pada Rumah Tinggal Tipe Townhouse di Surabaya. Surabaya: Prodi Desain Interior Universitas Kristen Petra, 2011.

S. Martoyo, Pengetahuan Dasar Managemen dan Kepemimpinan. Yogyakarta: BPFE, 1998.

D. Panjaitan and M. Pangestu, “The Impact of Daylight Apertures and Reflective Surfaces on the Effectiveness of Natural Lighting At the Rumah Kindah Office in Jakarta,” Riset Arsitektur (RISA), vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 70–88, 2018, doi: 10.26593/risa.v2i01.2932.70-88.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional, “SNI-03-6197-2000,” Jakarta, 2000.

A. P. Wibowo, “Kriteria Rumah Ramah Lingkungan (Eco-Friendly House),” Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, vol. 1, no. 1, May 2017, doi: 10.24912/jmstkik.v1i1.386.

G. Tanuwidjaja, Desain Arsitektur Berkelanjutan Di Indonesia: Hijau Rumahku Hijau Negeriku. 2011.

Y. R. Naura, A. Safira, and D. Larasati, “Isu-Isu Prioritas dalam Penerapan Eco-House Berdasarkan Gaya Hidup Hemat Energi dan Ramah Lingkungan,” Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–111, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.24252/nature.v9i1a8.

H. Frick and F. B. Suskiyatno, Dasar-Dasar Eko-Arsitektur: Konsep Arsitektur Berwawasan Lingkungan Serta Kualitas Konstruksi dan Bahan Bangunan untuk Rumah Sehat dan Dampaknya atas Kesehatan Manusia. Yogyakarta: Kanisius, 1998.

A. A. Muslim, Ashadi, and A. S. Fitri, “Konsep Arsitektur Ekologi pada Penataan Kawasan Wisata Candi Cangkuang di Garut, Jawa Barat,” Jurnal Arsitektur PURWARUPA, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–70, 2018.

A. Z. Arief and A. T. Subadyo, “Implementation of Ecohouse and Ecoliving Concept in Architecture,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, American Institute of Physics Inc., Nov. 2017. doi: 10.1063/1.5011602.

SHAU Architecture and Urbanism, “Private Housing EcoHouse Bandung Concept Design Presentation,” Bandung, 2017.

A. Arliana, N. S. Arina, and A. Nugroho, “Konsep Open-plan pada Rumah Tinggal: Studi Kasus, Rumah di Gg.Ramdhan II 128/47, Bandung,” Waca Cipta Ruang: Jurnal Ilmiah Desain Interior, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 51–57, 2021, doi: 10.34010/wcr.v7i2.3521.

R. H. W. Abdulhadi and A. B. S, “Strategi Pencahayaan Buatan Dalam Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru; Studi Kasus Rumah Tinggal HUNI,” Waca Cipta Ruang, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 38–45, 2021, doi: 10.34010/wcr.v7i1.4731.

A. Ashadi, N. Nelfiyanti, and A. Anisa, “Pencahayaan dan Ruang Gerak Efektif Sebagai Indikator Kenyamanan pada Rumah Sederhana Sehat yang Ergonomis (Studi Kasus Rumah Sederhana Sehat di Bekasi),” NALARs, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 35, 2016, doi: 10.24853/nalars.15.1.35-44.

Serge Ferrari, “Solar Protection Outdoor Screens.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sergeferrari.com/us-en/applications/outdoor-screens

M. D. Egan and V. Olgyay, Architectural Lighting (2nd Edition ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.

I. I. Wijaya, “Teknik Optimasi Pencahayaan Alami Dalam Interior Rumah Tinggal,” Simposium Nasional RAPI, pp. 377–384, 2017.

R. K. Sary, “Pengaruh Material Bangunan Terhadap Kekuatan Lantai Kamar Mandi Pada Rumah Tinggal,” Arsir, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 93, 2019, doi: 10.32502/arsir.v2i2.1301.

J. McCluskey, Roadform & Townscape. London: Library of Congress Cataloguing, 1992.

N. Ginting and A. F. Pohan, “Elemen Vegetasi dalam Penataan Ruang Kota Pada Koridor Jalan Jamin Ginting Berastagi,” Jurnal Arsitektur dan Perkotaan KORIDOR, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-24

How to Cite

[1]
P. B. B. Sutanty and Stefanus Christian Diyaneswara, “Evaluation of Natural Light in EcoHouse Bandung”, JARINA, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 95–104, Aug. 2024.