PERLINDUNGAN BAGI KELOMPOK AGAMA MINORITAS MENGHADAPI KELOMPOK AGAMA MAYORITAS: STUDI KASUS AHOK DAN MELIANA

Elisabeth Sundari, Anna Marieta Simangunsong, Isabelle Valerie, Matheus Nurlatu

Abstract


Through the case studies, Ahok and Meliana, this research aims to explain how the religious minority try to obtain protection to fulfill human rights when faced with religious majority pressure from the majority group. Normative research will answer the problem by analyzing the process of prosecution, the adjudication, and the punishment for Ahok & Meliana and the demonstration both outside the court and in the trial process demanding severe punishment for the accused of religious blasphemy. The result shows that even though it is difficult to prove directly, the mobilization of the masses in the judicial process can affect judges' independence to provide protection and justice for religious minority. The case of Ahok and Meliana shows how difficult it is for minority religious groups to seek protection against pressure from the majority religious groups because the State and Judges cannot prevent and take firm action against mass pressure from the majority religious groups against minority religious groups. The case such as Ahok and Meliana will occur as long as blasphemy's criminalization is still in effect. If the principle of non-discrimination or commutative justice is applied, and not the principle of protection based on 'partiality for the vulnerable,' the protection for religious minority groups will not be realized fully.


Keywords


judge; justice; majority; minority; blasphemy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Amnesty International, 2014, Mengadili Keyakinan: Undang-Undang Penodaan Agama Indonesia (versi Indonesia), Amnesty International.Ltd, London, United Kingdom.

___________________, 2018, Amnesty International Report 2017/2018, Amnesty International Ltd, London, United Kingdom.

Black, Henry Campbell, 1991, Black’s Law Dictionary, West Publishing Co, St.Paul.Mn.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2006, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Jurnal

Ali, S.I., Yusoff, M. Z., Ayub, Z. A., “Legal research of doctrinal and non-doctrinal” International Journal of Trend in Research and Development. Volume 4(1), Januari-Februari 2017.

Andeva, Marina, “Accommodating minority groups: the politics of minorities' protection in Italy”, New Balkan Politics Tetovo, Vol. 13, 2013.

Butt, Khalid Manzoor, “Revisiting Concept of Freedom of Expression Vis-à-vis Blasphemy: Laws Against Blasphemy from Ancient to Present Age”, Journal of Political Studies, Vol. 22, Issue 1, 2015/

Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo, “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 140/Puu-Vii/2009 Dan Jaminan Konstitusional Islam Nusantara”, ANALISIS: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Volume 15, Nomor 2, Desember 2015.

Fernandes, Deepali Ann, “Protection of Religious Communities by Blasphemy and Religious Hatred Laws: A Comparison of English and Indian Laws”, Journal of Church and States, Vol. 45. Issue 4, Autumn 2013.

Gawas, V. J, “Doctrinal legal research method a guiding principle in reforming the law and legal system towards the research development”, International Journal of Law, Volume 3, Issue 5, September 2017.

Gianfreda, Anna, “Religious Offences in Italy: Recent Laws Concerning Blasphemy and Sport”, Ecclesiastical Law Journal, Vol. 13, 2011.

Jacobs, Katherine, A.E., “Defending Blasphemy: Exploring Religious Expression Under Ireland’s Blasphemy Law,” Case Western Reserve Jpournal of Internastional Law, Vol.44, Issue 3, 2012.

Khan, Amir Ullah, Sana Ullah, Kamran Abdullah, “Personal-cum-Political Security & Blasphemy Laws in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis”, Pakistan Journal of Criminology, Vol. 10, Issue 1, January 2018.

Kumekawa, Ian, “Blasphemus Pluralism: Examining Indonesia’s Blasphemy Law”, Harvard International Review, Summer 2010.

Marshall, Paul, 2011, “Exporting Blasphemy Restrictions: The Organization Of The Islamic Conference And The United Nations”, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 9:2.

Totten, Michael J., “Radical Islam's Global Reaction: The Push For Blasphemy Laws”, World Affairs, Vol. 175, Issue 5, Jan/Feb 2013.

Widelitz, Kiley, “A Global Blasphemy Law: Protecting Believers at the Expense of Free Speech”, Pepperdine Public Policy Review, 2013.

Zylfiu, Ilir, Ardian Emini, “The Issue of Minorities in the Balkans: Towards a Coherent System of Protection of Minorities”, Acta Universitatis Danubius Relationes Internationales, Vol. 10, No 1, 2017.

Internet

BBC Indonesia, “Tanjung Balai mencekam, toko tutup, belum ada pelaku yang ditangkap”,https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2016/07/160730_indonesia_tanjungbalai_update, diakses 8 Agustus 2016.

Bernie, Mohammad, “Beda Vonis Meiliana dan Pelaku Perusakan & Pembakaran Klenteng”, https://tirto.id/beda-vonis-meiliana-dan-pelaku-perusakan-pembakaran-klenteng-cUmL, diakses tanggal 23 Agustus 2018.

Billiocta, Ya’cob, “Para terdakwa kasus perusakan vihara Tanjung Balai divonis ringan”, https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/para-terdakwa-kasus-perusakan-vihara-tanjung-balai-divonis-ringan.html, diakses tanggal 24 Januari 2017.

El Rahman,Vanny, “Dari Ahok hingga Meliana, 17 Orang Ini Divonis karena Menista Agama”, https://jabar.idntimes.com/news/indonesia/vanny-rahman/ahok-hingga-meliana-ini-daftar-17-orang-yang-divonis-menista-agama-regional-jabar/4, diakses 1 September 2019.

Humanist International, “The Freedom of Though Report 2019, Key Countries Editions”, https://fot.humanists.international/download-the-report/, diakses tanggal 13 Desember 2019.

Mazrieva, Eva, Adrianzah, “Meski Banding, Pengadilan Tinggi Tetap

Vonis Meliana 18 Bulan”, https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/permohonan-banding-meliana-ditolak/4628852.html, diakses 25 Oktober 2018.

Merriam-Webster, “Dictionary: Synonim of blasphemy”, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/blasphemy, diakses tanggal 15 Mei 2020.

Muktiono, “Judicial Protection for a Religious Minority in Indonesia under the Shadow of the Blasphemy Law”, Working Paper SHAPE SEA Research Project, Juni 2019, http://shapesea.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/6-Muktiono. Academic-Paper.edited.pdf, diakses tanggal 14 Desember 2019.

Tim CNN Indonesia, “Kronologi Kericuhan Demonstrasi Anti Ahok di Depan Istana”, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20161104201401-20-170410/kronologi-kericuhan-demonstrasi-anti-ahok-di-depan-istana, diakses tanggal 5 November 2019.

United Nation Human Rights Council, “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief resolution adopted by the Human Rights Council”, 12 April 2011, A/HRC/RES/16/18. https://www.refworld.org/docid/4db960f92.html, diakses 16 Mei 2020.

United Nation Human Rights, “Blasphemy laws exposed, The Consequences of Criminalizing Defamation of Religions”, https://lib.ohchr.org/HRBodies/UPR/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/HRBodies/UPR/Documents/session13/ID/HRF_UPR_IDN_S13_2012_HumanRightsFirst_Annex_E.pdf&action=default&DefaultItemOpen=1, diakses 23 Juni 2019.

United Nation Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, “News: UN expert urges global repeal of blasphemy laws to boost religious freedom”, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=22286&LangID=E, diakses 19 Agustus 2019.

Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Kasasi No.1929K/Pid.Sus/2017 tentang Penistaan Agama oleh “Markus Pole Datu”.

Putusan Kasasi MA No.1108 K/PID/2017 tentang Ajaran Islam sesat oleh Gerakan Fajar Nusantara (Gafatar).

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009 tentang judicial review atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1/PNPS/Tahun 1965 tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan/atau Penodaan Agama.

Putusan Peninjauan Kembali MA Nomor 11/PK/Pid/2018 tentang Kasus penodaan agama Basuki Tjahaya Purnama alias “Ahok”.

Putusan PN Bandung Nomor 674/Pid.B.2017/PN.Bdg. tentang Kasus pelanggaran UU ITE oleh Buni Yani.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Timur No.1107/Pid.Sus/2016/PN Jkt.Tim tentang Ajaran Islam sesat oleh Gerakan Fajar Nusantara (Gafatar).

Putusan PN Jakarta No.1537/Pid.B/2016/PN.Jkt.Utr. tentang Kasus penodaan agama Basuki Tjahaya Purnama alias “Ahok”.

Putusan PN Karawang No.417/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Kwg. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Aking Saputra.

Putusan PN Medan No.1546/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Mdn. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Martinus Gulo.

Putusan PN Medan No.1612/Pid.B/2018/Pn.Mdn. tentang Kasus penistaan agama Meliana.

Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pandeglang No.28/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Pdl. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Arnoldi Bahari.

Putusan PN Pekan Baru No.465/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Pbr. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Soni Suasono.

Putusan PN Semarang No.9/Pid.B/2017/PN Smg. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Andrew Handoko.

Putusan PN Surabaya No.1619/Pid.Sus/2018/PN SBY. tentang kasus penistaan agama oleh Dwi Handoko.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Bandung No.17/PID./2018/PT BDG. tentang kasus penistaan agama oleh Aking Saputra.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI No.105/PID.SUS/2017/PT DKI. tentang Ajaran Islam sesat oleh Gerakan Fajar Nusantara (Gafatar).

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jawa Tengah No.106/PID/2017/PT SMG. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Andrew Handoko.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Pekan Baru No.210/PID.SUS/2017/PT PBR. tentang Kasus penistaan agama oleh Soni Suasono.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v36i2.3118

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.