A Study on L1 Use in English Classroom: Perception and Practice
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of L1 in language learning has become a debate for years. The opponents of L1 use argue that the use of first language (L1) may deprive the exposure of the target language (L2) that will affect learners L2 acquisition. As the consequence, learners must use L2 all the time for learning. However, the proponents say that there is not any evidence showing the use of exclusive L2 makes learners get higher achievement. Instead, the L1 enables learners to notice L2 features, to clear up misunderstanding, to learn vocabulary and grammar faster and to memorize the language. There have been a lot of studies conducted to see the perception of teachers and students on the use of L1 and the practice of L1 use in the classroom. However, few discuss the teacher and student interaction in the framework of IRF (initiation-response-follow up) exchange and Conversation Analysis. The teachers thought that the use of L2 should be used maximally, while students preferred combining L1 and L2 for learning. In the practice, L1 was still constantly used by teachers and students. Teachers usually used L1 for knowledge building and managing classes, while students used L1 for all aspects of learning.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ariffin, K., & Husin, M. S. (2011). Code-Switching and Code-Mixing of English and Bahasa Malaysia in Content-Based Classrooms: Frequency and Attitudes. The Linguistic Journal, 220–247.
Borlongan, A. M., Lim, J. H., & Roxas, R. E. (2012). University Students’ Attitude towards English-Tagalog Code-Switching in Classroom Instruction. TESOL Journal, 70–77.
Brooks-Lewis. (2009). Adult learners’ perception of incorporation of their L1 in foreign language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics, 216–235.
Burden, P. (2004). An examination of attitude change towards the use of Japanese in a university English conversation class. Regional Language Centre Journal, 21–36.
Cahyani, H., de Courcy, M., & Barnett, J. (2016). Teachers’ code-switching in bilingual classrooms: Exploring pedagogical and sociostructural functions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–15.
Carless, D. (2008). Students use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. . ELT Journal, 331–338.
Chafi, M. E., & Elkhouzai, E. (2016). The use of feedback in classroom interaction in Moroccan primary school. . European Scientific Journal, 281–301.
Chavez, M. (2016). The first language in the foreign language classroom: teacher model and student language use – an exploratory study. Classroom Discourse, 7(2), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1149499
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2003). Telling each other to do things in class: directives in content and language integrated classrooms. Views, 3–23.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford Press University.
Ferguson, G. (2009). What next? Towards an agenda for classroom code-switching research. . International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 231–241.
Forman, R. (2012). Six Functions of Bilingual EFL Teacher Talk: Animating, Translating, Explaining, Creating, Prompting and Dialoguing. RELC Journal, 43(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212449938
Gardner-Chloros, P. (2009). Code-Switching. Cambridge University Press.
Horasan, S. (2014). Code-Switching in EFL classrooms and the perceptions of the students and teachers. . Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, X(1), 31–45.
Kulas, J. T., & Stachowski, A. A. (2009). Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. Journal of Research in Personality, XL III(3), 489–493.
Kurata, N. (2014). Construction of L1/L2 use in informal social networks: A study of learners of Japanese in Australia. Linguistics and Education, 14–29.
Lee, J. H., & Macaro, E. (2013). Investigating age in the use of L1 or English-only instruction: Vocabulary acquisition by Korean EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal, 887–901.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2009). How Languages are Learned. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 320–337.
Macaro, E., & Lee, J. H. (2013). Teacher language background, codeswitching, and English-only instruction: Does age make a difference to learners’ attitudes? . TESOL Quarterly, XLVII(4), 717–742.
Manara, C. (2007). The use of L1 support: Teachers’ and students’ Opinion and practices in an Indonesian context. . The Journal of ASIA TEFL, IV(1), 145–178.
McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching Second Language Classrooms. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moore, P. J. (2013). An emergent perspective on the use of the first language in the English-as-a-foreign- language classroom. . The Modern Language Journal, 239–253.
Sampson, A. (2011). Learner code-switching versus English only. ELT Journal, 1–11.
Sharpe, T. (2008). How can teacher talk support learning? (Science Direct, 132–148.
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (2002). Towards an analysis of discourse. In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis . Routledge.
Sukyadi, D., & Islamiyah, M. (2012). Elicitation techniques in questioning used by content and language integrated learning classroom teachers. Conference on English Studies. Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia.
Turnbull, M., & Arnett, K. (2002). Teachers’ use of the target and first languages in second and foreign language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 204–218.
Viiri, J., & Saari, H. (2006). Teacher talk pattern in science lessons: Use in teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 347–365.