Design and Implementation of Blockchain in a Website-Based Electronic Medical Record System Using the Prototype Model

Authors

  • Umi Chotijah Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-5771
  • Harunur Rosyid Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • Deni Sutaji Gazi University, Turkey
  • Danang Haedar Guswanrinandi Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • M. Rizaldi Zidan Nabil Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • Muhammad Asad Muhibbin Akbar Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v8i2.13498

Abstract

The security and integrity of medical record data is a crucial issue in the era of healthcare service digitalization. Traditional systems still face risks of manipulation, information leaks, and issues with interoperability between healthcare institutions. Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising solution to address this issue thanks to its features of decentralization, openness, and difficulty in modification. One consensus method that can be applied is Proof of Work (PoW), which has proven to maintain the authenticity of transactions on a distributed network. This research aims to design and evaluate a blockchain-based medical record application using the PoW consensus algorithm to ensure the security, transparency, and reliability of medical data storage. The approach used is experimental, involving the development of a blockchain-based application prototype. The PoW algorithm is applied to ensure the validity of medical record data transactions. The evaluation was conducted by measuring the security aspect (resistance to data changes), performance (time to verify transactions), and scalability (number of transactions that can be handled). The results of the experiment show that implementing PoW in a medical record system can maintain data integrity with a high level of resistance to unauthorized changes. The average time for transaction verification is 2.4 seconds per block, with the ability to handle up to 150 transactions per minute. Although the performance of PoW requires significant computational resources, the level of security it offers suggests potential for implementation in larger healthcare systems. The application of blockchain with the PoW algorithm to medical records has proven to improve the security and transparency of medical information. This research successfully met the established objectives, although computational efficiency issues still need to be addressed. Further research is suggested to explore other consensus algorithms such as Proof of Stake (PoS) or Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) to improve performance without sacrificing security aspects.

Keywords: Blockchain, Electronic Health Records (EHR), Proof of Work (PoW), Smart Contract, Healthcare Information System

Author Biographies

Umi Chotijah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

please give me information

Harunur Rosyid, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

Department of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering

Deni Sutaji, Gazi University, Turkey

Institute of Informatics, Computer Science, Gazi University, Turkey

Danang Haedar Guswanrinandi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

Department of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering

M. Rizaldi Zidan Nabil , Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

Department of Informatics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering

Muhammad Asad Muhibbin Akbar , Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

Department of Informatics, Faculty of Engineering

References

[1] C. C. Agbo, Q. H. Mahmoud, and J. M. Eklund, “Blockchain technology in healthcare: A systematic review,” Healthc., vol. 7, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/healthcare7020056.

[2] C. S. Kruse, M. Soma, D. Pulluri, N. T. Nemali, and M. Brooks, “The effectiveness of telemedicine in the management of chronic heart disease – a systematic review,” JRSM Open, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2017, doi: 10.1177/2054270416681747.

[3] U. Zaman, Imran, F. Mehmood, N. Iqbal, J. Kim, and M. Ibrahim, “Towards Secure and Intelligent Internet of Health Things: A Survey of Enabling Technologies and Applications,” Electron., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1–43, 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11121893.

[4] X. Zhang, Y. Jian, X. Li, L. Ma, G. Karanis, and P. Karanis, “The first report of Cryptosporidium spp. in Microtus fuscus (Qinghai vole) and Ochotona curzoniae (wild plateau pika) in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau area, China,” Parasitol. Res., vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1401–1407, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-5827-5.

[5] Satoshi Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” . bitcoin.org. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

[6] et al. Xia, C., “Role of T Lymphocytes in Type 2 Diabetes and Diabetes Associated Inflammation,” J. Diabetes Res., 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6494795.

[7] S. Mehammed, “Optimizing Proof-of-Work for Secure Health Data Blockchain Using Compute Unified Device Architecture,” vol. 1, pp. 1–10.

[8] D. Soloviova, “Development and Research of the Methodology for Improving the Proof-of-Work Blockchain Technology by Implementing Dynamic Clustering of Network Nodes,” 2025, doi: 10.1049/blc2.70006.

[9] A. Kumar, D. K. Sharma, A. Nayyar, and S. Singh, “Lightweight Proof of Game ( LPoG ): A Proof of Work ( PoW )’ s Extended Lightweight Consensus Algorithm”.

[10] A. Roehrs, C. A. Da Costa, R. Da Rosa Righi, and K. S. F. De Oliveira, “Personal health records: A systematic literature review,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 19, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.2196/jmir.5876.

[11] A. Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T. and Lippman, “Medrec: Using Blockchain for Medical Data Access and Permission Management,” in 2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD), 2016, pp. 25–30.

[12] S. Angraal, H. M. Krumholz, and W. L. Schulz, “Blockchain technology: Applications in health care,” Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1–3, 2017, doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003800.

[13] T. T. Kuo, H. E. Kim, and L. Ohno-Machado, “Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications,” J. Am. Med. Informatics Assoc., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1211–1220, 2017, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx068.

[14] N. Menachemi and T. H. Collum, “Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems,” Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy, vol. 4, no. May 2011, pp. 47–55, 2011, doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S12985.

[15] D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. M. Bolker, and S. C. Walker, “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4,” J. Stat. Softw., vol. 67, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.

[16] A. A. Yaqoob, M. N. M. Ibrahim, and C. Guerrero-Barajas, “Modern trend of anodes in microbial fuel cells (MFCs): An overview,” Environ. Technol. Innov., vol. 23, p. 101579, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101579.

[17] and W. K. J. Vijay Vaishnavi, Vijay K. Vaishnavi, “No Title,” in Design Science Research Methods and Patterns Innovating Information and Communication Technology (Second edition.), CRC Press, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1201/b18448

[18] A. Ekblaw and A. Azaria, “Viral Communications MedRec: Medical Data Management on the Blockchain License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0),” assets.pubpub.orgA Ekblaw, A Azaria, T Vieira, A LippmanViral Commun. 2016•assets.pubpub.org, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://assets.pubpub.org/77ffonfi/fac98e84-5f2c-4828-a1ba-e2141e747ee6.pdf

[19] M. Conti, E. S. Kumar, C. Lal, and S. Ruj, “A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues of Bitcoin,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3416–3452, 2018, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2842460.

[20] F. D. Wihartiko, S. Nurdiati, A. Buono, and E. Santosa, “Blockchain dan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pertanian : Studi Literatur,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 177, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.0814059.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Chotijah, U., Rosyid, H., Sutaji, D., Guswanrinandi, D. H., Nabil , M. R. Z., & Akbar , M. A. M. (2026). Design and Implementation of Blockchain in a Website-Based Electronic Medical Record System Using the Prototype Model. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 8(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v8i2.13498