Between Intuition and Instruction: Comparison of Generative Models in Symbolic Design Ideation Case Study of IKN Garuda Palace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v5i2.13749Keywords:
Symbolic Design, Architecture Ideation, Visual Communication, Generative Design, Efficiency ProductivityAbstract
This study aims to map the comparison of various artificial intelligence (AI)-based generative models, particularly the shift from design intuition to text-based command instructions, as a potential source of ideas in symbolic architecture design. While generative AI is increasingly adopted in creative fields, there remains a critical research gap in the systematic evaluation of how different conversational platforms respond to abstract, symbol-based architectural narratives during early-stage ideation. To address it, this study employs a qualitative-comparative case study approach to evaluate three popular text-to-image generative models: Copilot, ChatGPT, and Gemini. The study was conducted by deploying identical command prompts based on the symbolic narrative of the Garuda National Capital (IKN) Palace and comparing the outputs across dimensions such as visual quality, contextual accuracy, diversity of ideas, generation speed, and adaptability to change. The concrete findings reveal distinct computational behaviours: Copilot excels at architectural integration through monumental abstraction, ChatGPT prioritises literal and explicit symbolic replication, and Gemini offers highly fluid, narrative-driven conceptual sketches. Based on these results, the concept of AI's potential is proposed through three main discussion frameworks: variation exploration, productivity efficiency, and communication visualisation. This study contributes a new evaluative framework for human-machine interaction in architectural pedagogy and practice, demonstrating how tailored prompt descriptions can transform AI from a passive visualisation tool into an active, reflective conceptual partner.
References
[1] A. C. Antoniades, Poetics of Architecture: Theory of Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ABVQAAAAMAAJ
[2] A. Caesar Effendi and P. Satwiko, "Peran Artificial Intelligence dalam Tahap Perencanaan dan Perancangan Desain Arsitektur," JoDA J. Digit. Archit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52-59, 2021. https://doi.org/10.24167/joda.v1i1.3682
[3] R. Maulida and others, "Komparasi Respons ChatGPT dan Gemini terhadap Command Pattern Identik dengan Metode Black Box," J. Tek. Inform., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 68-71, 2024. https://doi.org/10.51998/jti.v10i2.588
[4] T. Tiara and F. Y. Pamuji, "Komparasi Usability Chatgpt Vs Gemini Ai Berdasarkan Iso/Iec 9126 Dan Nielsen Model Menggunakan Metode Usability Testing," JUSIM (Jurnal Sist. Inf. Musirawas), vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 89-100, 2024. https://doi.org/10.32767/jusim.v9i1.2285
[5] A. N. K. Ningki, N. Hikmah, A. Harrama, F. N. Alishah, and M. I. R. I. Lukman, "Penerapan AI dalam Presentasi Visualisasi Desain Arsitektur," in SEMINAR NASIONAL DIES NATALIS 62, 2023, vol. 1, pp. 335-340. https://doi.org/10.59562/semnasdies.v1i1.917
[6] R. Evans, "Translations from drawing to building," AA files, 1986.
[7] S. E. Indrawan, "KAJIAN MAKNA HUNIAN PASKA BENCANA DALAM SUDUT PANDANG FILOSOFIS," ALUR J. Arsit., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 118-124, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.54367/alur.v4i2.1333. https://doi.org/10.54367/alur.v4i2.1333
[8] P. Plowright, Revealing architectural design : methods, frameworks and tools. London New York: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852454
[9] M. Carpo, The second digital turn: design beyond intelligence. MIT press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9976.001.0001
[10] M. Carpo, The alphabet and the algorithm. Mit Press, 2011.
[11] H. Wijayanto and M. A. W. Prakarsa, "Peran Kritis Teknik Gambar Bentuk dalam Proses Desain," Warn. (Journal Vis. Commun. Des., vol. 3, no. 2, 2023.
[12] Enjellina, E. V. P. Beyan, and Anastasya Gisela Cinintya Rossy, "Review of AI Image Generator: Influences, Challenges, and Future Prospects for Architectural Field," J. Artif. Intell. Archit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 53-65, 2023, doi: 10.24002/jarina.v2i1.6662. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v2i1.6662
[13] S. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Li, "Knowledge-driven and diffusion model-based methods for generating historical building facades: A case study of traditional Minnan residences in China," Information, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 344, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060344
[14] N. Bredella, The architectural imagination at the digital turn. Routledge, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003189527
[15] Ö. Kevserouglu and R. Kurban, "Comparison of Text-to-Image Generative AI Tools for Urban Portraits: A case study of Invisible Cities by using Stable Diffusion, DALL-E and MidJourney," CITY, Reg. Plan., p. 49, 2024.
[16] I. As, S. Pal, and P. Basu, "Artificial intelligence in architecture: Generating conceptual design via deep learning," Int. J. Archit. Comput., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 306-327, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077118800982
[17] B. P. Redyantanu, Y. A. Yatmo, and P. Atmodiwirjo, "Object as Portal: Actual-Virtual Multi-Space of Temporary Urban Games Space," Plan J., vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.15274/tpj.2024.09.01.8. https://doi.org/10.15274/tpj.2024.09.01.8
[18] S. Chaillou, "Archigan: Artificial intelligence x architecture," in Architectural Intelligence: Selected Papers from the 1st International Conference on Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication (CDRF 2019), 2020, pp. 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6568-7_8
[19] C. Jencks, The Language of Post-modern Architecture. Rizzoli, 1977. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Sz04AQAAIAAJ
[20] G. Broadbent, Design in Architecture: Architecture and the Human Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, 1973. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=DAlQAAAAMAAJ
[21] A.-S. Horvath and P. Pouliou, "AI for conceptual architecture: Reflections on designing with text-to-text, text-to-image, and image-to-image generators," Front. Archit. Res., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 593-612, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.02.006
[22] P. D. Plowright, Revealing Architectural Design. 2014. doi: 10.4324/9781315852454. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852454
[23] G. Bansal, A. Nawal, V. Chamola, and N. Herencsar, "Revolutionizing visuals: The role of generative AI in modern image generation," ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1-22, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1145/3689641
[24] B. Michelle and M. P. Gemilang, "A Bibliometric Analysis of Generative Design , Algorithmic Design , and Parametric Design in Architecture," vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30-40, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v1i1.4921
[25] S. Retno Yanti, "Architecture of the Virtual World," J. Artif. Intell. Archit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 28-36, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.24002/jarina.v2i2.6756. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v2i2.6756
[26] S. Chaillou, Artificial intelligence and architecture: from research to practice. Birkhäuser, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783035624045
[27] J. Paskett, "Text-to-Image Generative AI Use in Co-design," The Ohio State University, 2025.
[28] T. Mahendarto, "From Artificial Intelligence to Artificial Consciousness: An Interior Design Implication," J. Artif. Intell. Archit., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41-52, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.24002/jarina.v2i1.6627. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v2i1.6627
[29] L. N. Groat and D. Wang, Architectural Research Methods. Wiley, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=0jADDQAAQBAJ
[30] R. Rosyadi, S. Handayani, and others, "Makna Filosofi Symbol Lambang Burung Garuda Pada Desain Gedung Istana Ibu Kota Negara Baru," MESA (Teknik Mesin, Tek. Elektro, Tek. Sipil, Tek. Arsitektur), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 12-19, 2021.
[31] A. L. Rahmawati, "Form Follows Meaning: An Analysis of the 'Istana Garuda' Design through the Lens of Mimesis," Cult. Arts Res. Dev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 10-23, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55121/card.v4i2.216
[32] L. Persohn, "Curation as methodology," Qual. Res., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20-41, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120922144
[33] Q. Ye, M. Ahmed, R. Pryzant, and F. Khani, "Prompt engineering a prompt engineer," in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, 2024, pp. 355-385. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.21
[34] H. Vo, "Anatomy of a Prompt: a Semiotic System of Text-to-Image Gen AI," diségno, no. 16, pp. 255-264, 2025.
[35] P. F. Yuan, "Tectonics as the disenchantment of Generative Artificial Intelligence," Archit. Intell., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 13, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-025-00090-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bramasta Putra Redyantanu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1.Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
