Perencanaan Darurat Menghadapi Krisis pada Kementerian dan Lembaga Nonstruktural Pusat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24002/jik.v17i2.2191Keywords:
contingency plan, humas pemerintah, perencanaan darurat krisisAbstract
Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan perencanaan darurat krisis oleh humas pemerintahan Indonesia. Penelitian terdahulu menunjukkan perencanaan krisis penting untuk meminimalkan dan membatasi dampak krisis. Contingency plan merupakan bentuk perencanaan darurat krisis yang efektif di era keterbukaan informasi. Peneliti melakukan wawancara kualitatif terhadap 16 informan praktisi humas pemerintah yang masuk peringkat keterbukaan informasi publik. Penelitian ini menghasilkan lima proposisi: posisi struktural humas memengaruhi peran manajemen krisis, konstruksi humas tentang krisis memengaruhi strategi perencanaan krisis, humas pemerintah belum memiliki contingency plan, tim manajemen krisis bukan bagian strategi humas lembaga pemerintah dalam manajemen krisis, dan konstruksi humas terkait krisis memengaruhi strategi manajemen krisis dan hambatannya.References
Aslanov, R. M. (2016). The right to information in the legislation of the Azerbaijan Republik. Computer Law & Security Review, 32 (6), 888-897
Avery, E. J., Graham, M., & Park, S. (2016). Planning makes (closer to) perfect: Exploring united states local government official sevaliations of crisis management. Journal of contingencies and Crisis Management, 24 (2), 73-81.
Bruins, H. J. & Bu, F. (2006). Food security in China and contingency planning: the significance of grain reserves. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14 (3), 114-124.
Buhlmann, M., Merkel, W., Müller, L., & Webels, B. (2012). The democracy barometer: A new instrument to measure the quality of democracy and its potential for comparative. European Political Science, 11 (4), 519-536.
Cho, S & Yeong-Hong, S (2016). Journalists’ evaluation of the South Korea government’s crisis management in the Cheonan incident. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 24 (4), 222-229.
Claeys, A. & Cauberghe, V. (2015). The role a favorable pre-crisis reputation inprotecting organizations during crises. Public relationss Review, 41, 64-71.
Coombs, W. T. (2015). Crisis communication and its allied fields. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.
Cordella, A. & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in publik service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 32 (3), 279-286.
Cordella, A., & Bonina, C. M. (2012). A publik value perspective for ICT enabled publik sector reforms: A theroritical reflection. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 512-520.
Dalton, R., Shin, D., & Jou, W. (2009). Understanding democracy: Data from unlikely places. Journal of Democracy, 18 (4), 142-156.
Daymon, C. & Holoway, I. (2011). Qualitative research methods in public relationss and marketing communications (Ed. 2). New York: Routledge.
Einwiller, S. A. & Steilen, S. (2014). Handling complaints on social network sites- an analysis of complaints and complaint responses on facebook and twitterpages of large US companies. Public relationss Review, 41 (2), 195-204.
Ellison, N. & Hardey, M. (2014). Social media and local government: citizenship, consumption and democracy. Local Governement Studies, 40 (1), 21-40.
Eriksson, K. & McConnell, A. (2011). Contingency planning for crisis management: Recipe for success or political fantasy? Policy and Society, 30, 89-99
Hancock, M., Amankwaa, L., Revell, M. & Mueller, D. (2016). Focus group data saturation: a new approach to data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21 (11), 2124-2130.
Hawes, J.O. (2010). Transparency and city government communications. (Thesis, Brigham Young University). Diakses melalui http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd
Hong, H. (2014). The internet, transparency, and government-public relationsships in Seoul, South Korea. Public relationss Review, 40 (3), 500-502.
Johnson, C. W. (2008). Using evacuations for contingency planning to enhance the security and safety of the 2012 olympic venues. Safety Science, 40, 302-322.
Kalenborn, C. & Lesmann, C. (2013). The impact of democracy and press freedom on corruption: conditionality matters. Journal of Policy Modeling, 35, 857–886.
Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S. & Moravcsik, A. (2011). Constitutional democracy and world politics: a response to Gartzke and Naoi. International Organization, 65, 599-604.
Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2019). Crisis response vs crisis cluster: A test of situational crisis communication theory on two crisis clusters in Indonesian public relations. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 222-236.
Kriyantono, R., & Sa’diyah, H. (2018). Kearifan lokal dan strategi komunikasi public relations di BUMN dan perusahaan swasta. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 15(20), 171-188.
Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2017). Developing culturally-relevant public relations theory for Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1), 1-16.
Kriyantono, R., Destrity, N. A., Amrullah, A. A., & Rakhmawati, F. Y. (2017). Management of public relations for supporting the anti-corruption national program in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Business & Economic Research, 15(20), 293-303.
Kriyantono, R. (2017). Teori public relationss perspektif barat & lokal aplikasi penelitian dan praktik. Jakarta: Kencana.
Kriyantono, R. (2015a). Public relationss & crisis management. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Kriyantono, R. (2015b). Kontruksi humas dalam tata kelola komunikasi lembaga pendidikan tinggi di era keterbukaan informasi publik. Jurnal Pekommas, 18 (2), 117-126.
Kriyantono, R. (2014). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Lee, M. (2012). Government public relationss: what is it good for? Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Liu, B & Levenshus, A. (2012). Crisis public relationss for government communicators. California: SAGE publikations.
LyLe, T. (2015). Government crisis assessment and reputation management. A case study of the Vietnam Health Minister’s crises in 2013-2014. KOME − An International. Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 3 (1), 32-46.
Malizia, E. (1982). Contingency planning for local economic development. Environment and Planning, 9, 163-176.
McConnell , A & Drennan, L. (2006). Mission impossible? Planning and preparing for crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 14 (2), 222-229.
McConnell., A. (2011). Success? Failure? Something in between? A framework for evaluating crisis management. Policy and Society, 30, 63–76.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (Ed. 3). California: Sage Publikations.
Neuman, W. L. (2015). Metodologi penelitian sosial: pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks.
Payne, J. L. (2009). Making the world safe for muddle: the meaning of democracy in American Foreign Policy. The Independent Review, 13 (4), 601-610.
Searson, E. M. & Johnson, M. A. (2010). Transparency laws and interactive public relationss: An analysis of Latin American government web sites. Public relationss Review, 36, 120-126.
Sen, A. F. (2015). Communications and humas rights. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2813 – 2817.
Waymer, D. (2013). Democracy and government public relations: Expanding the scope of “Relationship” in public relations research. Public relationss Review, 39, 320– 331.
Wijaya, F.R., Kriyantono, R., & Wisadirana, D. (2015). Perception of the public relations function of the government institution that implement bureaucratic reforms. International Journal of Development Research, 5 (4), 4184-4192.
Williams, A. (2014). The effect of transparency on output volatility. Economics of Governance, 15, 101–129.
Wimmer, R. D. & Dominick, J. R. (2011). Mass media research an introduction (Ed. 9). Boston: Wadsworth
Yamakawa, Y. & Cardon, M. S. (2017). How prior investments of time, money, and employee hires influence time to exit a distressed venture, and the extent to which contingency planning helps. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 1-17.
Yannoukakou, A. & Araka, I. (2014). Access to government information: right to information and open governmentdata synergy. Social and Behavioral sciences, 147, 332-340.
Yoldas, O. B. (2015). Civic education and learning democracy their importance for political participation of young people. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 544-549.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI is an academic journal. As such, it is dedicated to the open exchange of information. For this reason, JIK is freely available to individuals and institutions. Authors who publish in Jurnal ILMU KOMUNIKASI will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution (BY) License. This license allows anyone to copy and redistribute the article in any medium or format as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially as long as they credit the authors for the original creation. For details of the rights authors grants users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
