Perancangan Desain Taman Luar Pusat Pastoral Sanjaya Muntilan (PPSM)

Authors

  • Sugesti Retno Yanti
  • Prasasto Satwiko Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
  • Lucia Asdra Ludwiarti Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
  • Bhanu Rizfa Hakim Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/jai.v5i6.12503

Keywords:

landscape architecture, ENVI-met, park, thermal comfort, PPSM

Abstract

The Sanjaya Muntilan Pastoral Center (PPSM) has excellent potential as a public space that supports spiritual, educational, and social activities. However, limited outdoor facilities and uncomfortable environmental conditions challenge the area's development. This study aims to design an outdoor garden based on sustainable landscape architecture that enhances comfort, ecological value, and social functionality at PPSM. The methods employed include literature review, field observation, SWOT analysis, and thermal comfort simulation using ENVI-met software. The design outcomes include functional zone division, selection of local vegetation, and integration of hardscape–softscape elements. Thermal simulations during peak outdoor activity hours (08:00, 10:00, 16:00, and 18:00 WIB) showed a significant reduction in PET temperatures in key areas, demonstrating the design's effectiveness in creating a more comfortable microclimate. With an ecological and participatory approach, this park is expected to become a green oasis supporting pastoral services and the well-being of the surrounding environment.

References

[1] D. Pucungrejo, “Data Demografi Berdasar Agama,” Website Layanan Mandiri Desa Pucungrejo, 2025. https://pucungrejo.magelangkab.go.id/first/statistik/3

[2] B. E. Putra, “Kajian Spiritualitas dan Ekologi Terhadap Pemahaman Jemaat di GSJA Bukit Horeb Salatiga Tentang Taman Gereja,” Repos. Institusi | Univ. Kristen Satya Wacana, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://repository.uksw.edu//handle/123456789/28445

[3] P. Mohammad, S. Aghlmand, A. Fadaei, S. Gachkar, D. Gachkar, and A. Karimi, “Evaluating the Role of the Albedo of Material and Vegetation Scenarios Along the Urban Street Canyon for Improving Pedestrian Thermal Comfort Outdoors,” Urban Clim., vol. 40, p. 100993, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100993.

[4] J. A. P. Saputra and N. Sekarlangit, “Perancangan Kawasan Wisata Gua Permoni Desa Trimulyo, Kabupaten Bantul Dengan Pendekatan Berbasis Iklim,” in Prosiding SENAPAS, 2024, pp. 116–121. [Online]. Available: https://ojs.uajy.ac.id/index.php/SENAPAS

[5] I. N. Priandani et al., “Enhancing Outdoor Thermal Comfort with Shade-giving Trees in Humid Tropical Public Spaces: A Case Study of Alun-alun Bandung,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1404, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1404/1/012011.

[6] A. Kaczynski and K. Henderson, “Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity.,” J. Phys. Act. Health, vol. 5 4, pp. 619–632, 2008, doi: 10.1123/JPAH.5.4.619.

[7] L. Yinan et al., “Harmony in Nature: Exploring the Multisensory Impact of Classical Gardens on Individuals’ Well-Being.,” HERD, p. 19375867241276300, 2024, doi: 10.1177/19375867241276299.

[8] P. Heintzman, “Spiritual Outcomes of Park Experience: A Synthesis of Recent Social Science Research,” 2013, [Online]. Available: https://consensus.app/papers/spiritual-outcomes-of-park-experience-a-synthesis-of-heintzman/85eeb8c5ec395d579848de5d1a899160/

[9] K. Adrián, “Kenyamanan Termal Ruang Terbuka Hijau Rptra Di Jakarta,” Indones. J. Spat. Plan., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 14, 2020, doi: 10.26623/ijsp.v1i1.2281.

[10] R. A. Suprapto and A. H. Arthasari, “The Environmental Thermal Comfort Analysis of Public Space in Jetayu Park, Pekalongan City,” Geogr. Tech., pp. 151–158, 2020, doi: 10.21163/gt_2020.151.32.

[11] M. V. Wirastri, A. A. A. R. T. A. Karang, and I. T. Prasetyo, “Perancangan Area Outdoor Radio Komunitas Balai Budaya Minomartani, Kabupaten Sleman,” J. Atma Inovasia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2025, doi: 10.24002/jai.v5i1.10184.

[12] P. de Lacy and C. Shackleton, “Aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites,” Sustain., vol. 9, no. 9, 2017, doi: 10.3390/su9091628.

[13] E. Wahyuni and Q. Qomarun, “Identifikasi Lansekap Elemen Softscape Dan Hardscape Pada Taman Balekambang Solo,” Sinektika J. Arsit., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 114–124, 2015, doi: 10.23917/sinektika.v13i2.755.

[14] Direktorat jenderal Penataan Ruang, Pedoman Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kawasan Perkotaan. Jakarta, 2008.

[15] N. Ambarwati, L. R. Wijayanti Faida, and H. Marhaento, “The Effects of Green Open Spaces on Microclimate and Thermal Comfort in Three Integrated Campus in Yogyakarta, Indonesia,” Geoplanning, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–44, 2023, doi: 10.14710/geoplanning.10.1.37-44.

[16] R. Ampornpitak, P. Khobpee, W. Unawong, N. Leksungnoen, and P. Tor-Ngern, “An Urban Tree (Tabebuia argentea) Exhibits Higher Sensitivity to Environmental Conditions than an Urban Palm (Ptychosperma macarthurii) Growing in the Same Roof Garden: An Implication for Sustainable Urban Water Use,” Appl. Environ. Res., vol. 45, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.35762/AER.2023003.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles