Cost of Debt, Managerial Overconfidence, Institutional Shareholding, and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Indonesia Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v30i2.14449Keywords:
ESG performance, cost of debt, managerial overconfidence, institutional ownershipAbstract
This study examines the influence of the cost of debt, managerial overconfidence, and institutional shareholding on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance among firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Using a quantitative approach, the study analyzes 85 firms with available ESG scores in 2024. Multiple linear regression analysis is employed to test both partial and simultaneous effects. The findings indicate that financing conditions, behavioral biases, and ownership structures collectively shape corporate sustainability outcomes. Specifically, the cost of debt reflects financial constraints that influence ESG investments, while managerial overconfidence exhibits a context-dependent effect. Institutional shareholding plays a significant governance role by enhancing monitoring and encouraging ESG engagement. Overall, this study contributes to the limited empirical literature on ESG determinants in emerging markets, particularly Indonesia, and provides insights for investors, regulators, and corporate decision-makers.
References
Abdelwahab, A., Chen, Y., Abdelwahab, Y., & Azam, M. (2025). The effect of CEO overconfidence on corporate ESG performance: An empirical study of Chinese A share listed companies. Asian Journal of Economics Business and Accounting, 25(6), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2025/v25i61840
Angir, P., & Weli. (2024). The influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on firm value: An asymmetric information perspective in Indonesian listed companies. Binus Business Review, 15(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v15i1.10460
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112(106186), 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186
Cepêda, C., Monteiro, A. P., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2025). Bridging the ESG credibility gap: The role of institutional investors in mitigating ESG decoupling. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(6), 7139–7160. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4336
Choi, M., Choi, S., & Han, S. H. (2025). Terrorist attacks, CEO overconfidence, and ESG performance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5396586
Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the challenges of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: The path to broader Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(2), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020606
Du, J., Zhu, R., & Ye, Q. (2024). Managers’ overconfidence, institutional investors’ shareholding, and corporate ESG performance. Finance Research Letters, 106594, 106594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106594
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly: The Journal of the Society for Business Ethics, 4(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
Gao, W., & Liu, Z. (2023). Green credit and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 55(103940), 103940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103940
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Gunawan, W. B. (2025). The interlink between capital structure, sales growth, and sustainable growth rate: Comparative insights from IDX Growth and IDX Sharia Growth. Klabat Accounting Review, 6(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.60090/kar.v6i2.1337.81-93
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x
Jia, F., Li, Y., Cao, L., Hu, L., & Xu, B. (2022). Institutional shareholders and firm ESG performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(22), 14674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142214674
Jia, G., & Bai, E. (2025). The green credit policy and the ESG performance of heavily polluting enterprises in China. Frontiers in Earth Science, 13(1502190). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1502190
Johnston, A., Belinga, R., & Segrestin, B. (2021). Governing institutional investor engagement: from activism to stewardship to custodianship? Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2021.1965338
Karki, U., Bhatia, V., & Sharma, D. (2024). A systematic literature review on overconfidence and related biases influencing investment decision making. Economic and Business Review, 26(2), 130–150. https://doi.org/10.15458/2335-4216.1338
Kaur, A., Joshi, M., Singh, G., & Sharma, S. (2024). The impact of corporate reputation on cost of debt: A panel data analysis of Indian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8), 367. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17080367
Kurniawati, A. D., & Michelle, P. (2025). Enhancing sustainable transparency: A content analysis of sustainability reporting in financial vs. non-financial sectors. KINERJA, 29(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v29i1.10338
Leong, C. K., & Yang, Y. C. (2021). Constraints on “Doing Good”: Financial constraints and corporate social responsibility. Finance Research Letters, 40(101694), 101694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101694
Li, W., & Pang, W. (2023). The impact of digital inclusive finance on corporate ESG performance: based on the perspective of corporate green technology innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(24), 65314–65327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27057-3
Liao, Y., & Zhou, X. (2024). Real green or fake green? Impact of green credit policy on corporate ESG performance. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03596-z
Liu, F. H., Wu, Q., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Bank deregulation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Stability, 74(101313), 101313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101313
Liu, J., Xiong, X., Gao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). The impact of institutional investors on ESG: Evidence from China. Accounting and Finance, 63(S2), 2801–2826. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13011
Lu, Y., Liu, T., Zhang, J., & Jameel, H. M. (2025). When confidence backfires: The impact of managerial overconfidence on environmental information disclosure. Sustainability, 17(16), 7322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167322
Ma, D., He, Y., & Zeng, L. (2024). Can green finance improve the ESG performance? Evidence from green credit policy in China. Energy Economics, 137(107772), 107772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107772
Muchenje, L. T., Coupe, T., & Dang, H. D. (2025). Credit development and ESG performance: Cross-country evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 78(103007), 103007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103007
Ogundipe, A. A., Daugaard, D., Khan, F., & Jia, J. (2025). Managerial overconfidence and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance – international evidence. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5336605
Pitaloka, R. B., & Slamet, K. (2025). CIT rate and tax holiday as tax competition tools to attract inward FDI in ASEAN-6. KINERJA, 29(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v29i2.10723
Qasem, A., AL-Duais, S. D., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., & Thomran, M. (2022). Institutional ownership types and ESG reporting: The case of Saudi listed firms. Sustainability, 14(18), 11316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811316
Sare, M. T. S., & Kurniawati, A. D. (2025). Assessing the risk of fraudulent financial reporting in Indonesian banking companies through the lens of hexagon fraud analysis. KINERJA, 29(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v29i2.12289
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Sun, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2024). Responsible investment: Institutional shareholders and ESG performance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 85(102357), 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102357
Wang, J., Xing, Y., & Xiao, D. (2025). An empirical study on the relationship between executives’ financial background and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102(104141), 104141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104141
Wang, X., Zhou, B., & Li, X. (2025). Qualified foreign institutional investors and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 101(104032), 104032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104032
Wang, Yao, Han, Y., Du, Q., & Hou, D. (2023). Executive overconfidence and corporate environmental, social, and governance performance. Sustainability, 15(21), 15570. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115570
Wang, Yizhi, Lin, Y., Fu, X., & Chen, S. (2023). Institutional ownership heterogeneity and ESG performance: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 51(103448), 103448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103448
Wen, Y. (2025). CEO overconfidence and corporate ESG: The role of firm specific economics policy uncertainty. Advances in Economics and Management Research, 14(1), 670. https://doi.org/10.56028/aemr.14.1.670.2025
Wu, Y., Hou, L., Yuan, Y., Ma, S., & Zeng, H. (2025). Green credit policy’s influence on construction firm ESG performance: a difference in differences estimation. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2025.2480752
Yoo, J. W., & Chang, Y. J. (2024). Domestic vs. Foreign institutional investors: Who improves ESG and value of Chinese companies? Sustainability, 16(18), 8238. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188238
Zhang, L., Li, D., Xiao, Z., Jiang, J., & Lu, F. (2024). Does overconfident CEO lead to corporate environmental misconducts? Evidence from China. PloS One, 19(9), e0309957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0309957
Zhao, Y., Gao, Y., & Hong, D. (2024). Sustainable innovation and economic resilience: Deciphering ESG ratings’ role in lowering debt financing costs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16(1), 4309–4343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02129-y
Zumente, I., & Bistrova, J. (2021). ESG importance for long-term shareholder value creation: Literature vs. Practice. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 7(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020127
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 William Ben Gunawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
