The Impact of Compliance Pressure, Task Complexity, and Auditor Expertise on Audit Judgment

Authors

  • Endang Raino Wirjono Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta
  • Vinia Filliati Fridata Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/kinerja.v27i2.7454

Keywords:

compliance pressure, task complexity, auditor expertise, audit judgment

Abstract

This study aims to re-examine previous research on the effect of Compliance Pressure, Task Complexity, and Auditor Expertise on audit judgment but on different objects. The research was conducted in Yogyakarta, Solo, and Semarang, with the respondents being auditors who worked in Yogyakarta, Solo, and Semarang Public Accounting Firms. Data was obtained by distributing questionnaires as many as 50 questionnaires. The number of questionnaires that were returned and processed was 40 questionnaires. Data processing is done using the multiple linear regression method after testing the validity and reliability first. The results showed that task complexity had a negative effect on audit judgment. Meanwhile, compliance pressure and auditor expertise do not affect audit judgment.

References

Anthony, R. N., and Govindarajan, V., 2007. Management Control Systems. McGraw Hill: Singapore.

Arens, A., Elder, R., and Beasley, M. S., 2008. Jasa Audit dan Assurance Pendekatan Terpadu (Adaptasi Indonesia). Salemba Empat: Jakarta.

Bonner, S. E., 1994. A model of the effects of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, Vol. 19, pp. 213-234.

Dana, A. L., 2019. Pengaruh locus of control, framing, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap audit judgment (studi empiris pada kantor akuntan publik kota Malang). E-JRA, Vol. 08 No. 10.

Ghozali, I., 2002. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang.

Hartono, J., 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-Pengalaman Ed 2007. BPFE-Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta.

Hery. 2016. Financial Ratio For Business: Analisis Keuangan untuk Menilai Kondisi Finansial dan Kinerja Perusahaan. Grasindo: Jakarta.

Jamilah, S., and Fanani, Z., 2007. Pengaruh gender, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X.

Komalasari, R., and Hernawati, E., 2015. Pengaruh indepedensi, kompleksitas tugas, dan gender terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Neo-bis, 9(2).

Marta, M. F., 2017. Ketika Opini Audit BPK Tak Lagi Bermakna. Retrieved from https://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2017/05/31/090000426/ketika.opini.audit.bpk.tak.lagi.bermakna

Messier, Jr., W. F., Glover, S. M., and Prawitt, D. F., 2006. Jasa Audit & Assurance : Pendekatan Sistematis. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.

Mulyadi., 1992. Pemeriksaan Akuntan Edisi Ke-4. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN: Yogyakarta.

Nafisah, N. 2017, Agustus 8. Peran Profesionalisme Auditor. Retrieved from https://www.kompasiana.com

Putri, P. A., and Laksito, H., 2013. Pengaruh lingkungan etika, pengalaman auditor, dan tekanan ketaatan terhadap kualitas audit judgment. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 2, pp. 1-11.

Sari, D. I., and Ruhiyat, E., 2017. Locus of control, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Aset (Akuntansi Riset), 9(2), pp. 23-34.

Sofiani, M. O., and Tjondro, E., 2014. Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, pengalaman audit, dan audit tenure terhadap audit judgment. Tax and Accounting Review, 4(1).

Sujarweni, V. W., 2014. SPSS Untuk Penelitian. Pustaka Baru Press: Yogyakarta.

Tampubolon, L. D., 2018. Pengaruh tekanan ketaatan, pengetahuan, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal InFestasi, 14(2), pp. 169 – 177.

Tuanakotta, T. M., 2014. Audit Berbasis ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Wells, J. T., 2011. Financial Statement Fraud Casebook: Baking the Ledgers and Cooking the Books. John Wiley & Sons.

Published

2023-09-24

Issue

Section

Articles