Optimized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Open RAN Slicing

Authors

  • Femi Elegbeleye North West University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v9i1.14219

Abstract

Fifth generation (5G) networks enable radio access network (RAN) slicing, allowing a shared physical infrastructure to be partitioned into multiple logical slices, each tailored to meet heterogeneous service requirements. Slice tenants specify service-level agreements (SLAs) that must be satisfied; however, inefficient resource allocation mechanisms frequently result in SLA violations. Recent studies have adopted constrained multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to dynamically allocate RAN resources, yet these approaches often remain inefficient due to reward misalignment with SLA objectives and unstable exploration in high-dimensional state–action spaces. This paper presents a reward-function–centric analysis of constrained MARL for 5G RAN slicing, examining how different reward designs affect learning efficiency and SLA compliance. Based on this analysis, we propose heuristic-guided reward shaping strategies that explicitly align the learning objective with SLA satisfaction and resource utilization efficiency. In addition, we introduce a state-space optimization technique that aggregates local agent states into a weighted global state representation, thereby reducing state dimensionality while preserving critical SLA-related information. Extensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves a 60% reduction in SLA violations compared to an existing constrained MARL model and a 46% reduction compared to a state-of-the-art model-based reinforcement learning approach. Furthermore, the proposed solution converges faster and requires less training time and computational resources, highlighting its effectiveness and practical applicability for efficient 5G RAN slicing.

References

[1]. Y. Azimi, S. Yousefi, H. Kalbkhani, and T. Kunz, “Applications of machine learning in resource management for run-time slicing in 5G and beyond networks: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 106581–106612, 2022.

[2]. L. U. Khan, I. Yaqoob, N. H. Tran, Z. Han, and C. S. Hong, “Network slicing: Recent advances, taxonomy, requirements, and open research challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 36009–36028, 2020.

[3]. S. K. Singh, R. Singh, and B. Kumbhani, “The evolution of radio access network towards Open RAN: Challenges and opportunities,” pp. 1–6, 2020.

[4]. I. A. Bartsiokas, P. K. Gkonis, D. I. Kaklamani, and I. S. Venieris, “ML-based radio resource management in 5G and beyond networks: A survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 83507–83528, 2022.

[5]. H. P. Phyu, D. Naboulsi, and R. Stanica, “Machine learning in network slicing—a survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 39123–39153, 2023.

[6]. N. Van Huynh, D. Thai Hoang, D. N. Nguyen, and E. Dutkiewicz, “Optimal and fast real-time resource slicing with deep dueling neural networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1455–1470, 2019.

[7]. M. Zangooei, M. Golkarifard, M. Rouili, N. Saha, and R. Boutaba, “Flexible RAN slicing in Open RAN with constrained multi-agent reinforcement learning,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 280–294, 2024.

[8]. J. J. Alcaraz, F. Losilla, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi, “Model-based reinforcement learning with kernels for resource allocation in RAN slices,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, pp. 486–501, 2023.

[9]. C. C. White and D. J. White, “Markov decision processes,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1989.

[10]. Y. Li, “Deep reinforcement learning,” 2018.

[11]. R. S. Sutton, D. McAllester, S. Singh, and Y. Mansour, “Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation,” vol. 12, 1999.

[12]. F. Berkenkamp, M. Turchetta, A. Schoellig, and A. Krause, “Safe model-based reinforcement learning with stability guarantees,” vol. 30, 2017.

[13]. L. Busoniu, R. Babuska, and B. De Schutter, “A comprehensive survey of multi-agent reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 156–172, 2008.

[14]. Y. Liu, J. Ding, and X. Liu, “A constrained reinforcement learning-based approach for network slicing,” in Proc. IEEE ICNP, pp. 1–6, 2020.

[15]. Y. Abiko et al., “Flexible resource block allocation to multiple slices for radio access network slicing using deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 68183–68198, 2020.

[16]. D. Horgan et al., “Distributed prioritized experience replay,” 2018.

[17]. F. Lotfi, F. Afghah, and J. Ashdown, “Attention-based Open RAN slice management using deep reinforcement learning,” pp. 6328–6333, 2023.

[18]. W. Zhao et al., “Research on the multi-agent joint proximal policy optimization algorithm controlling cooperative fixed-wing UAV obstacle avoidance,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 16, 2020.

[19]. I. Vilà, J. Pérez-Romero, O. Sallent, and A. Umbert, “A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for capacity sharing in multi-tenant scenarios,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 9450–9465, 2021.

[20]. N. Ghafouri et al., “A multilevel deep RL-based network slicing and resource management for O-RAN-based 6G cell-free networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, pp. 1–12, 2024.

[21]. M. Sulaiman et al., “Coordinated slicing and admission control using multi-agent deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1110–1124, 2023.

[22]. M. K. S. Sibeko, “Network slicing custom code and models,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/MkSibeko/RANSLICING/

[23]. F. Elegbeleye, M. Mbodila, A. Mabovana, and O. Esan, “Data privacy on using four models: A review,” in International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies, pp. 1–6.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-31

How to Cite

Elegbeleye, F. (2026). Optimized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Open RAN Slicing. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 9(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v9i1.14219

Issue

Section

Articles